Subtextstudio

Sol Systems · Systems, technology & applied research

Systems that know where language ends and consequence begins.

Sol Systems develops relational-AI architecture, operational safeguards and interaction design for teams whose systems talk with people and act in the world. The work stands on a published framework, and every engagement names exactly what it claims.

What you can buy

Fixed scopes, defined deliverables, findings mapped to published specifications. Each engagement ends with a document your team can act on without us in the room.

  • 01

    Relational-AI architecture review

    A structured review of your conversational or agentic system: interaction risk, drift exposure, consent handling, refusal behaviour, tool-use boundaries and legibility surfaces. Delivered as a graded report with prioritised recommendations, each traceable to the published specification cards.

    For teams shipping AI products who want an outside eye with a written framework behind it.

  • 02

    Companion-interaction safety audit

    A focused audit for companion, character and persistent-assistant products, assessing the behaviours regulators now name explicitly: sycophancy and agreement-reinforcement dynamics, memory and retention practices, disclosure, break patterns, and boundary handling in distress-adjacent contexts. Design-and-documentation scope, with a remediation map.

    For companion and character-AI products facing new state laws and sharpening scrutiny.

  • 03

    Memory & consent governance review

    For products shipping persistent memory: what gets written, when, under which consent state, with what retention and revocability, and how scope changes surface to the user. Built on consent-as-state and memory-governance specifications designed for exactly this problem.

    For assistants that remember, built by teams who want their users to have agreed to that.

  • 04

    Safety-surface language systems

    Refusal copy, consent microcopy, action previews, disclosure and boundary phrasing, designed as systems rather than one-off strings: stable schemas, word budgets, reading-level constraints, register discipline. Drafted by writers, specified by architects, with no translation loss between the two.

    For products whose safety features exist but read like an apology or a legal notice.

  • 05

    AI literacy & safe-interaction training

    Workshops and training programmes for teams that build with or deploy AI: capabilities and limits, interaction risk, prompt discipline, responsible communication and human–AI co-creation. AI literacy has been a standing obligation for providers and deployers in the EU since February 2025.

    For organisations that need their people fluent, and their regulator satisfied.

  • 06

    Implementation blueprints & conformance preparation

    Research-to-specification translation: Minimal Kernel Profile blueprints, Declare-Then-Act workflows, telemetry and drift-monitoring plans, challenge suites, runbooks and verifier documentation. We lead architecture, semantics and documentation; specialist engineering capacity is assembled to project scope.

    For teams ready to build, who want the specification right before the code exists.

Enquire about an engagement

The framework underneath

The Semantic Resonance Field trilogy is Sol Systems' flagship research body: a conceptual ontology (The Alignment Paradox), a deterministic containment architecture (The Alignment Kernel), and thirty-two executable specification cards (The Alignment Protocol) covering gates, drift detection, consent state, memory governance, refusal design, culture-aware framing, care as procedure, audit chains and acceptance criteria. Published and openly licensed, so you can check our claims against our sources.

Honest tiering

Every engagement, product and deployment names its tier. A hosted surface carries stance, never enforcement, and documentation never implies running machinery. You will always know which of these you are buying:

SRF-informedSelected principles carried as design stance.
SRF-derivedBuilt from the specifications, without full conformance claims.
MKP-conformantMeets the Minimal Kernel Profile's published acceptance criteria.
Fully conformantMeets all hard invariants of the published specification.